VOICE Home Page: http://www.os2voice.org |
April 2002
[Newsletter Index]
|
By Don Eitner © April 2002 |
Theodore "Teddy" Roosevelt must surely be spinning in his grave over the
Microsoft/Department of Justice (DoJ) collaboration formerly known as an anti-trust
trial. Not only do the DoJ's recently subdued penalties for Microsoft's demonstrated
illegal monopoly practices leave the door wide open for Microsoft to continue doing
business as usual, but now the DoJ lawyers are in court fighting to keep the judge
from imposing any more stringent penalties on the software giant. This after three
years of consecutive wins in the courtroom where two levels of the US court system
ruled that Microsoft had violated anti-trust law and illegally maintains its monopoly
position in the market. Someone got paid off to drop the case. Of that I have no
doubt.
Nine states attorneys general are still pursuing justice in the case at the will
of the people of the United States of America. Microsoft's new plan appeared in
February of 2002 in the form of often-cited hyperactive president Steve Ballmer
testifying on the witness stand on the verge of tears that Microsoft may have to
withdraw Windows from the market if further litigation by these nine states continues.
This is such an obvious cry for attention and pity; a cheap ploy to get concerned
citizens and business owners to protest the states' quest for justice against the
illegal monopoly. All of Microsoft's previous attempts to sway opinion have failed
miserably because they forgot that the attorneys general of each state actually
know the names of cities in their own states and could figure out that people in
cities that don't exist could not have mailed letters of support for Microsoft and
that the dead don't write letters at all.
So Microsoft has been reduced to begging for sympathy. They will never pull their
monopoly product from the market. What reason would anyone have to buy MS Office
or to use MS Internet Explorer and Outlook Express if Windows no longer exists?
The whole company would fold if they pulled Windows from the market, and the only
people who would lose anything are Microsoft and any business manager who is so
inept that they cannot protect their own business from such an event by ensuring
that their company is not tied to one single supplier of software.
There's a rule of thumb in the business world which goes back hundreds if not
thousands of years -- the business man who rejects all but a single supplier digs
his own grave. What would these businesses do if a major natural disaster wiped
Redmond, Washington off the map? They'd be in the same situation as if Microsoft
withdrew all support for Windows. So when one really thinks about this, any responsible
business owner or manager has already done everything in his or her power to ensure
that their company's entire future is not tied directly to any single supplier so
that a failure of any one such supplier will not drive their own business down.
Anyone else is a fool and deserves to go out of business because they did not heed
this time tested truth.
The Irish once relied almost entirely on potatoes for food. A famine wiped out
their crop. Irish people died by the hundreds each week. If they had established
a large fishing culture such as that found in Japan (both being islands, you see),
they would have had more food and could have greatly reduced fatalities. Think about
it.
[Feature Index]
editor@os2voice.org
[Previous Page] [Newsletter Index] [Next Page]
VOICE Home Page: http://www.os2voice.org