The Redmond Borg keep assimilating!
The Redmond Borg keep assimilating!
(Microsoft announced the acquisition of Connectix' products). While I still don't
understand whether M$ in fact bought the 'company' or rather the 'product' I am
afraid that the evil empire again took another step forward in the extinction of
competitive technologies - or at least a way of "gaining control" of it.
For a long time, I thought that while VPC enables people to walk away from other
platforms onto M$ so-called "operating systems" by providing backwards
compatibility for vital applications, it also provides the risk of people moving
the other way round: Run Office-[whatever version of the day] on your Mac, Linux...
even OS/2? That - in fact - could mean that people won't buy M$ platforms anymore
because their applications will run within virtual win-machines on different platforms.
What a wonderful world this would be.
But no my dear: VPC doesn't include a license to run Win-whatsoever... this means:
If you want to get away from Windows XP for example by running eCS with a virtual
WinXP (for your Office XP) you still need a license for Win XP, as VPC only provides
the virtual machine technology - not the machine itself!
Here's the link to the "acqusition faq" (PDF): http://www.connectix.com/downloadcenter/pdf/AcquireQandA_022003.pdf
So here's the bottom line:
VPC will make M$ sell more Office-[whatever version of the day] because it'll run
on non-M$ platforms by appropriate virtual machines. In addition, people who want
to run virtual M$ machines on their Linux, Mac or whatsoever in fact need a "license"
for the M$ operating system within their virtual PC. So VPC will make M$ gain access
in both platform and application markets that were unreachable before. At first
sight, this acquisition seems to only provide advantages: For M$, for those who
still run OS/2 and those who don't care about either one (the Linux and Mac folks).
But in the long term, we'll end up with a mix of whatsoever... but M$ will be in
it.
And now let's take a look back:
Some years ago, Windows ran on home desktops. Word and Excel helped them gain access
to the professional environments. Companies decided to change to so-called "operating
systems" that where better suited to run M$-Office. (Okay, this might not be
very accurate, but let's simplify the whole process this way).
Now - what can be learned from this? You'll run Office on your Linux in a virtual
Win machine. Great. Your company will change to Outlook or Notes... running in the
same virtual machine. And then you'll either get a new CEO who can't cope with anything
but the stuff he knows (M$ products) or someone else has discovered the "VPC
stuff" seems to "slow down" Notes and Office. And here you are: A
native operating system to better support Notes, Office or Outlook. Another one
bites the dust.
Abstract:
Resistance is futile - you'll be assimilated.
Personal point of view:
That's why I won't run any M$ on my OS/2: I prefer "native stuff" too.
To conclude:
If we want to fight the evil empire, we need people to work on native products.
And here's for the "make it freeware" folks: Freeware is great. I want
all developers to work for free... ...of course given the prerequisite of "Freerent",
"Freecars", "Freefood" and "Freeheating" only! Hey,
c'mon! If everything is freeware: Who'll be able to earn money?.
[Feature Index]
editor@os2voice.org
[Previous Page] [Newsletter Index] [Next Page]
VOICE Home Page: http://www.os2voice.org